// chapter 00
You just won the lottery
What changes when expert knowledge costs 20 dollars a month?
Freddy Vega, founder of the online school Platzi, opens his talk What if everything goes right with AI? with an uncomfortable story: a lot of lottery winners end up worse off afterwards.
The easy explanation is moralistic: "easy money, hard life", karma, blah blah blah. Freddy's is more interesting: money is the end of excuses.
Think about your usual excuses:
- I don't go to the gym because I have no time, and a personal trainer costs an arm and a leg.
- I'd eat better, but eating well is expensive and complicated. You eat what there is.
- I'd read that difficult book… if I had the time.
Then you hit the jackpot. You have a trainer, a cook and all the time in the world. And if you're still not fit, still not eating well, still not reading… there's no one left to blame. Only you.
AI does something very similar. Freddy puts it like this:
— Freddy Vega, Platzi (translated from Spanish)"AI is the compression of expert knowledge, practically free, in everyone's hands."
For about 20 dollars a month you carry in your pocket almost the same models the most advanced researchers on the planet were using a couple of months ago. There's no secret supermodel, a thousand times better, hidden in a basement in San Francisco. What you have is, more or less, what there is.
So the question of this course isn't "what can AI do?". It's this one:
What happens when experts' time becomes infinite?
And, above all, what happens next? Before we move on, one thing.
// in short
AI doesn't hand you results: it takes away your excuses. It puts nearly free expert knowledge in your pocket, and that changes the question from "can I?" to "will I?".
// chapter 01
A confusion of ideas
If AI makes me more efficient, will I work less?
Christy Yao is a software engineer at a big tech company. She says she has this conversation over and over:
- So, with AI… are you even coding anymore?
- No. AI codes for me.
- Then you must have so much more free time!
- Well… no.
And it's not bad luck. It's a paradox more than 150 years old.
Watt, coal and a party-pooper economist
James Watt's steam engine did the same work with far less coal than the engines before it. The logical expectation: England would burn less coal. What actually happened: it burned far more.
With cheaper power, it paid to put engines everywhere: factories, mines, trains, ships. Each engine used less; the country used much more.
In 1865 the economist William Stanley Jevons explained it in The Coal Question and called the idea that "more efficiency = less consumption" a confusion of ideas. Today we call it the Jevons paradox.
The washing machine didn't give you your afternoons back
Christy brings it home with a book: More Work for Mother, by historian Ruth Schwartz Cowan (1983). Each household appliance made a chore easier… and the standard went up. Clean clothes used to be a once-a-week thing; now clean clothes every day and a spotless house are simply expected.
Three consequences follow, and they affect you directly:
What everyone has is the baseline
Once everyone has the tool, it stops giving you an edge. It becomes what's expected of you.
Every tool creates new work
With AI you have to prompt it, check it and fix it. Constantly. Because what if it gets something wrong?
The work moves to whoever holds the tool
From servants to mothers; from specialists to everyone. Now the report, the design or the code is on you.
The other side of the coin
Freddy uses the same paradox to reach an optimistic conclusion: if whatever gets cheaper gets used more, AI doesn't have to bring mass unemployment, but more demand for work… of a different kind.
His example: have you ever been happy to call a call center? "Yay, my paycheck is three days late, let me call!" Never. With AI and people working together, that service could finally be good, and handle far more cases.
Is he right? It's his thesis, and history gives him plenty of arguments, though transitions hurt whoever gets caught in the middle (more on that in chapter 2). What's beyond debate is the part that's up to you:
— Christy Yao"It takes a conscious effort to do less work and have more free time. Don't count on AI doing that for you. That's your decision."
// check
Your company adopts AI and each report now takes half the time. What's most likely a year from now?
Jevons in its purest form: if a report gets cheaper, more get requested, and the bar rises (more data, more charts, more versions). Option c can happen in specific cases, but usually the work changes and grows.
// in short
More efficiency doesn't mean less work: it means more use and a higher bar. What everyone has stops being an edge. Free time doesn't come standard: you decide it.
// chapter 02
Predict the traffic jam
What consequences is almost nobody looking at?
There's a science-fiction line, popularized by Frederik Pohl, that Freddy uses as a compass:
— Freddy Vega (translated from Spanish)"Good science fiction predicts the car. Great science fiction predicts the traffic jam."
Predicting the car is easy: it's what the technology does. That's the first order. The hard part is seeing what changes when everyone has a car: traffic jams, highways, suburbs, malls, gas stations. That's the second order.
Freddy points out something medicine and software have in common: in both, the bottleneck is us, the experts. If expert time becomes almost infinite, that bottleneck opens up. Let's see what happens.
Medicine becomes engineering
How long does a doctor's appointment last? Fifteen minutes? "It's a virus. Take this. Good luck. Bye."
Figuring out how a protein folds used to cost a PhD student their youth: "Come on, Martínez, give this protein ten years of your life." AlphaFold, from Google DeepMind, published predictions for more than 200 million proteins, openly.
And preventive health becomes continuous: your watch tracks heart rate, sleep and exercise; add the yearly blood test you get (you do get it, right? Liar), and warnings show up that used to arrive only in the ER.
- 1st order
- Faster diagnoses and discoveries.
- 2nd order
- Personalized medicine, and rare diseases nobody researched because "the numbers didn't add up" start to matter.
Science that never sleeps
The robots that impress us are the humanoids that dance ("we humans have a savage ego"). The interesting ones are boring little arms that carry samples from the microscope to the centrifuge. In 2024, a team linked autonomous labs in Cambridge and Singapore to run coordinated experiments with nobody at the wheel.
- 1st order
- Experiments 24/7.
- 2nd order
- Science is no longer limited by how many people can survive a PhD.
Infinite software
"Remember the word sprint? What a tragedy. There was an arcane era, when we all wore loincloths, when we used methodologies… and a thing called Kanban."
We built software the way 14th-century folk made clothes: thread by thread, with a little stick. Now the scaffolding —which, let's be honest, was most of the work— gets automated. Even banks trapped in COBOL can migrate ("COBOL programmers are dying off; turns out COBOL is bad for your health").
- 1st order
- Building software costs far less.
- 2nd order
- A micro-company with AI can match a big corporation's software quality. And the hard part is no longer building: it's getting someone to use it.
An entrepreneurship explosion
How do I create a brand? How do I take card payments? How do I incorporate? The "magic machine" answers everything. "Wait, is this idea illegal? Oh, it is. OK, next one."
- 1st order
- Starting a business is easier than ever.
- 2nd order
- Way more businesses competing for the same attention.
The collapse of the expert class
For centuries, having a degree put you above the rest. Many credentials are going to lose value, and that won't be welcomed: it breeds resentment, and people vote angrier than they vote happy. Software already shows a small version of this: endless debates about degrees "when the truth is almost all of us build software nobody uses". What happens when it's the lawyers' turn?
- 1st order
- Expert answers for anyone.
- 2nd order
- Degrees lose their signaling value, with social and political consequences.
The trust industry
"Now everything is fake." Is this photo real? Did an AI make this video? The question of the future is simple: is this true, and who guarantees it? The most common guarantee will be your name: "I made this, and I'm staking my reputation on it." There are already companies trying to build digital identities that prove you're human.
- 1st order
- Fake content indistinguishable from real.
- 2nd order
- Reputation and signatures are worth more than ever.
And yes, there's a flip side: the same technology makes mass surveillance and drones cheap, and crime learns AI faster than the law does.
// in short
First order is what AI does; second order is what changes when everyone uses it. Medicine, science and software speed up because experts were the bottleneck. What becomes scarce: attention, trust and reputation.
// chapter 03
The two doors
If everyone can create, who wins?
Freddy sums it up in one sentence:
— Freddy Vega (translated from Spanish)"The hard part won't be building software, but getting people to use it."
Put the pieces from the previous chapters together. Creating gets cheaper, so far more gets created (Jevons). Everyone has the tool, so building is the baseline, not the edge. Supply explodes… but people's attention doesn't. The result: a huge line at the "build one more thing" door and almost nobody at the "getting clients" door.
Why is almost everyone lining up at the wrong door? Because building is comfortable: it gives instant feedback, it depends only on you, and AI makes it even easier. Talking to customers is scary: they might say no.
The skills behind the short door are the ones becoming scarce:
- Understanding a real problem, for someone who would pay to solve it.
- Knowing what NOT to build: finding the minimum version.
- Selling, and daring to ask for payment.
- Distribution: reaching the places your people already are.
- Building trust: having your name back what you do.
- A sense of quality: knowing when something is actually good.
The good news: all of this can be trained. The bad news: nobody will train it for you. Sound familiar?
// in short
When creating is cheap, everyone creates. The line is at "one more feature"; the opportunity is in understanding problems, getting clients and building trust.
// chapter 04
Skipping the rep
Ban AI or use it? When yes and when no?
Jenny has a PhD in neuroscience and a one-year-old son who is fascinated every time she asks the smart speaker to turn off the lights. She, on the other hand, admits she's more scared than excited:
— Jenny, @buildwjenny"Our boomer parents prepared us for a world that doesn't exist anymore. And as millennial parents, we're about to make the exact same mistake."
She thinks her son's generation will face a bigger existential crisis than ours, with a very concrete question: what is the point of me when AI can do everything?
What's interesting is what she does about it. She doesn't keep her son away from AI. She protects two things:
- Critical thinking: thinking for himself, holding values that are actually his, looking at a piece of information, analyzing it and forming his own opinion.
- Creativity: imagination, which she considers the hardest thing for an AI to reproduce.
Both are muscles
In neuroscience this is called neuroplasticity: the brain strengthens the connections you use and prunes the ones you don't. If you hand a kid an AI that does the thinking from the very start, they skip the rep. And the muscle never gets built.
The answer key
Freddy tells it from another angle. Knowledge was always there, in libraries. The hard part was never having it, but going there, opening the book, not opening TikTok, doing the exercise, not peeking at the answer… and not opening TikTok.
Using AI mindlessly is studying with the answer key right next to you. If you copy the solutions from your algebra textbook, the only thing you learn is nice handwriting. That's why he believes AI will create two classes of people: for those willing to learn, "the sky's the limit"; for the rest, "more than an accelerator, it's a poison".
His stance is radical: don't write with AI, because writing is thinking. Just as we no longer haul sacks and so we go to the gym, now we need a mental gym.
Banning it isn't the answer
Not at home and not at work. AI is going to be part of that kid's life, and of your team's. Banning it only gets it used in secret and without judgment. What does work is what Jenny proposes: teaching when to use it, when not to, and why. Three simple rules:
If you're learning: you first
Try, get it wrong, then compare with the AI. If it goes first, you skip the rep.
If you've mastered it: go all in
Where you can check the result, AI is a multiplier. There's no rep left to protect.
If you sign it: understand it
Never hand in something with your name on it that you couldn't defend. Your signature is your trust (chapter 2).
// in short
Critical thinking and creativity are muscles: they grow with use and wither without it. Banning AI doesn't work; teaching when yes, when no and why does. If you're learning, you go first.
// chapter 05
The power was the spot
Why does your position in the network matter more than raw talent?
Regina George, queen of Mean Girls, wasn't the prettiest, or the smartest, or the nicest. And yet she ran the whole school. Why? Spoiler: math.
Remember the cafeteria map Janis draws for Cady? It tells you where everyone sits, but not the most important thing: who's connected to whom.
For that you need a graph: each person is a dot (a node) and each relationship a line (an edge). That simple. And that's how map apps, social networks and a whole lot of AI work.
Three ways to measure who's in charge
- Degree: how many lines you have. Regina has five, the most. But that doesn't explain everything.
- Betweenness: Gretchen has fewer lines, but she sits right between groups. "Gretchen knows everybody's business": any gossip going from one group to another goes through her. Remove her and the graph splits in two.
- Eigenvector centrality: it's not how many friends you have, but how important your friends are. Power reaches you on the rebound. With a similar idea (PageRank), Google started ranking the Internet: a page matters if important pages link to it.
What Cady does
Cady doesn't attack Regina head-on. She cuts her connections: separates her from Aaron, from Karen, from Gretchen. And who fills the gap? Cady. Not by being prettier or smarter: by standing in the same spot.
The power was never Regina's. It was the spot.
Companies have been doing AI with graphs for years
- Search engines: PageRank ranked the web by who links to whom.
- Social networks: they look at who follows whom and how things get shared, and use that to decide what you see and who sees what you post.
- Banks: they map who sends money to whom to catch fraud rings.
- Drugs: a molecule is a graph (atoms and bonds). In 2020, a model that reads molecules this way helped discover a new antibiotic, halicin.
And your brain too: neurons and connections. The neuroplasticity from the previous chapter is, literally, strengthening some edges and pruning others. Learning is changing your graph.
Your career and your company are graphs too
In a world where everyone builds (chapter 3), what sets you apart isn't only what you make, but where you sit in the network:
- Be a bridge: connect groups that don't talk to each other (business and tech, customers and product, your industry and AI). Information and opportunities flow through there.
- Connect with who matters: it's not about collecting contacts, but about relationships with nodes that are themselves well connected: clients who refer you, partners with networks.
- Don't depend on a single node: if your business depends on one client, one supplier or one person, removing them splits you in two. Run the Gretchen test.
- Leadership is a position you maintain: stop tending your lines and someone else will take the spot. Just ask Regina.
// check
At your company, only one person talks both to the main client and to the tech team. What's high, and what's the risk?
They're your company's Gretchen: everything goes through them. Hugely valuable… and a single point of failure. Build more lines between those groups.
// in short
Don't look at who someone is; look at their lines. Power comes from the number of connections, from being a bridge and from being connected to who matters. Companies have done AI with graphs for years; you can use the same logic for your career.
// chapter 06
What stays scarce
In a world of abundance, what will have value?
Freddy takes down a myth: the idea that nobody will have a job and money will be infinite "is absurd". The physical world is still finite. Land doesn't grow. People want a home where nobody bothers them. And even though you can buy croissants at any supermarket, what you want is "the little croissant with a bit of sugar on top and little bits of bacon". Beautiful, exclusive, special things will still be paid for.
What does change is the pace. When intelligence is cheap:
That virtuous cycle lets civilization skip steps. We'll get used to it quickly, but it will feel like the singularity.
In that abundant world, value moves to what stays scarce. Look back over the course and check for yourself.
// in short
Whatever AI makes cheap becomes abundant and stops setting you apart. Value moves to what's scarce: trust, attention, judgment, your position in the network, the physical and handmade… and will.
// chapter 07
No more excuses
So what are you going to do?
Back to the lottery. With AI, expert knowledge is in your pocket. Creating is almost free. That won't give you free time (Jevons), but it does take something away: your excuses.
That's why Freddy closes his talk with a question. Here it is, almost word for word:
— Freddy Vega, Platzi (translated from Spanish)"What do you dream of doing with your life? Not what you were dealt. Not the limits you have right now. Not the local, particular version of the excuse you give yourself for not living the story you say you'll live. But what are you going to do? Because there are no more excuses."
The seven ideas, on one screen
- AI doesn't give you results: it takes away your excuses.
- More efficiency isn't less work: it's more use and a higher bar.
- Look at the second order: the traffic jam, not the car.
- When creating is cheap, the line is at building; the opportunity is in getting clients.
- Judgment and creativity are muscles: if you're learning, you go first.
- The power is the spot: tend your lines.
- Value moves to what's scarce: trust, attention, judgment, network, the physical… and will.
Credits
This course is built on the ideas of these people. Go watch them: they tell it better on video.
- Freddy Vega · Platzi — ¿Y si todo sale bien con AI?, in Spanish (central thread, chs. 0–4, 6 and 7).
- Christy Yao — the Jevons paradox and AI (ch. 1).
- Jenny · @buildwjenny — critical thinking, creativity and neuroplasticity (ch. 4).
- AI, Drugs & Robots — graph theory with Regina George, in Spanish (ch. 5).
Other sources: W. S. Jevons, The Coal Question (1865); R. S. Cowan, More Work for Mother (1983); AlphaFold Protein Structure Database (EMBL-EBI and Google DeepMind, 2022); Bai et al., Nature Communications (2024); Stokes et al., Cell (2020). The two-doors illustration is recreated from an image circulating on social media.